|
Issue 16 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Publisher: Jack Burlin Editor: Patti Hammonds |
October 5, 2006 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
IN THIS ISSUE Articles of Interest: Rackmount Power Distribution Units and UL 60950-1 Part 16: "When is a toilet like a salt shaker?" |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Overview The
intent of this document is to define UL-60950-1, and provide an overview
of this standard as it applies to rackmount power distribution units
(PDUs). In addition the document will discuss the impact of products
that may Introduction As data centers become more complex and as more companies invest millions of dollars into data center integrity and safety, the need for equipment that has been tested to applicable standards is widely recognized. These standards ensure uptime, network and human safety. Standards such as UL 60950-1 are beginning to make an impact on design and implementation of IT equipment in the data center, yet products are still widely available that have not been redesigned to be compliant with this standard or have not been tested to this standard. What is UL 60950-1? UL
60950-1 Information Technology Equipment - Safety - Part 1. This
standard is applicable to mains-powered or battery-powered information
technology equipment, including electrical business equipment and
associated equipment. of the standard, as it applies to PDUs in relation to data center safety, is the branch circuit protection. Branch circuit protection requires that all outlets and receptacles be protected by an Overcurrent Protection Device such as a circuit breaker or fuse rated at or set at no more than the rating of the outlet or receptacle. This allows for compliance with the National Electric Code and engenders one of the main characteristics of differentiation between PDUs that comply with the standard vs.PDUs that may only be UL Recognized, comply with legacy standards, or may have no UL Certification. Why is UL-60950-1 important when implementing PDUs in data centers? It
is important to note that non-UL certified PDUs, and PDUs that do not
comply with applicable standards, may
The Technicalities of UL 60950-1
The standard does not allow for the use of “supplementary” Overcurrent Protection Device for the branch circuit. Supplementary Overcurrent Protection Device is defined as any
Why are many rack and enclosure manufacturers demanding that their ODM/OEM suppliers of PDUs now be compliant with UL 60950? In order to provide insight prior to developing an answer to this question, one must first understand the difference between UL recognized and UL Listed. UL recognized is a component to be used in the construction of another product. A UL Listed product is complete in its entirety and can be used by the purchaser. An example of this may
be the purchaser of an Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS) who examines
the UPS and finds The same customer may purchase another brand of UPS and after careful evaluation notice the unit does not have a UL Listing mark, however, recognizes the fan inside the unit and digital display have the UL Recognized Component marks. The purchaser decides to contact the manufacturer to inquire about the safety of the product and the manufacturer claims that the product was built with UL Recognized components, therefore “must” meet the requirements to be UL Listed. But this is not necessarily the case, because the UL Recognized component means the component alone meets the requirement for a specific, limited use. This concept has impacted many data center enclosure manufacturers who have obtained and/or are seeking UL 60950-1 certification for their newest products. In the ultra-competitive data center enclosure industry, many manufacturers are starting to differentiate by offering value-added services such as installing PDUs into the cabinetprior to shipping, which benefits the customer by decreasing the mean time of installation. Thus, if installed in the unit prior to shipping, the PDU becomes part of the UL 60950-1 enclosure “system.” Herein lies the crux
of the issue: Does the enclosure now have to remove its UL Listed
label if the PDU, that has been installed prior to shipment, is not UL
60950-1 Listed? Arno Zandbergen, Product Manager for Great Lakes Case
“We have spent considerable time and effort pursing and obtaining the
most applicable data center safety standard for our enclosures, UL
60950-1. We have discussed this with our UL liaisons and have been
advised that installing PDUs without the associated UL 60950-1 listing
would require the removal of the UL Listing sticker from the enclosure
prior to shipment. Not only does UL 60950-1 offer improvements in
branch circuit protection that directly affects safety, This demand by these enclosure producers may not only be based solely on the attraction to the extra branch circuit protection afforded by the standard, but may also be because the producers are desirous to be in complete compliance with UL and its guidelines at all times, regardless of local interpretation. Why aren’t many manufacturers offering power strips or PDUs with the UL-60950-1 certification?
Summary and Availability The market is still flooded with PDUs that are UL
Recognized Components and may only be compliant with UL 1363 or may have
no certification at all. Based upon safety requirements for branch
circuit protection and potential ISC distributes the entire Minuteman
Power Systems product line of Uninterruptible |
A Kevinism is a funny or intriguing statement or idea from our Vice President of Sales, Kevin Hunt. Kevin is a big fan of Sandra Bullock, Pizza Inn black olive pizza, and Dr. Pepper (not necessarily in that order). He is not a big fan of Chinese food, seafood, or other types of "dead" stuff. Kevin is an avowed vegetarian. However, there are a large number of things you would expect vegetarians would love to eat, yet Kevin won't touch them. Kevin actually divides his food into three groups:
Kevin limits himself to one meal a day of the things he likes that are good for you. I guess the rest of the time he has to eat things he does not like but that are good for you. So this makes me wonder why he won't eat certain vegetables. So far I have been able to develop a fairly large list of things that Kevin does not like:
Kevin will eat these "under protest." Yet Kevin has to eat things that are good for him that he does not like. It seems to me everything on this list would qualify. Here are the things Kevin will not eat at all:
Hominy is white corn, and Kevin really likes corn, so this one puzzles me. He loves veggie burgers made out of all kinds of things, but has evidently had bad experiences with the Tofu version of either the veggie burger or the veggie hot dog. I guess Tofu is one of those things that is so disgusting that even vegetarians won't eat it. Who can blame them? Turnips is questionable, since Kevin readily eats Okra, and I know from management training at General Dynamics that Okra is widely hated! When Kevin orders the veggie plate at Cheddars, he gets the Broccoli, the Broccoli and Cheese Casserole, Corn (with Broccoli), Green Beans (with Broccoli) and Carrots (sometimes with Broccoli). Yet he won't order the Broccoli with Broccoli. It might confuse the waiter. Kevin has a love-hate relationship with Onions. They seem to be OK sometimes and horrible at other times. Why he won't take the cheese enchiladas at El Chico with onions is beyond my comprehension. You can't really taste them anyway. Yet he will get onions on the weekly Pizza Inn pizza. Kevin's problem with Spinach seems to stem from childhood memories of Popeye cartoons. Kevin says "Spinach makes you strong, but it also makes you stupid. If Popeye's regular diet of Spinach really enhanced his abilities, he should know to eat the Spinach first! Yet Popeye always waits until he is just about dead before remembering the Spinach." Also, I think Spinach has gotten a bad rap from Popeye. It does not taste bad, but Kevin seems to think it does. He has convinced himself, and therefore won't eat it. The recent problem with E-Coli contaminated spinach has just increased Kevin's diatribe against the hapless vegetable. It is not the fault of the spinach that it got contaminated. I am sure once the outbreak is over, that spinach will rebound with a vengeance. Then Kevin better be on the lookout.
Here is a question from the glory days of rock and roll. Q: Who sang "The man who shot Liberty Valance? All correct answers will be placed into a pool for a random drawing
at the end of the month. The winner will receive a free 25 foot reel of
reusable velcro cable ties (part number
MD88-25RLBK), plus free ground shipping. Send your answers to: See next month's newsletter for the winner and the correct answer. Answer from September's Newsletter. Q: What were the names of the two ghosts (man and wife) who were only seen by Topper (played by Leo G. Carroll) on the Topper TV show? A: The ghostly couple haunting Cosmo Topper were George and Marion Kirby. There was no winner this month. Only company
employees came up with the correct answer. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Part 16 Continued from September Since the October 2005 issue
the following personality types have been defined: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Here is what the symbols in the above grid represent: NC
= no conflict, + OR - = possible
conflict, +
= minor conflict, ++
= major conflict Conflict Analysis - Major Conflicts There are three areas of major conflict. Of the three, the most surprising is that the Interior Decorator has a major conflict with the Paleolithic Man. The thing that makes this unusual is the fact that both like the toilet lid down. However, since their are significant differences in the "secondary" uses of the toilet, and how each person views the role of the toilet in these secondary uses, this is the source of conflict between the Interior Decorator and the Paleolithic Man. The other two areas of conflict revolve around the Macho Man. Interior Decorator and Paleolithic Man If you think about it, these two types are about as close to polar opposites as possible. The Paleolithic Man can be imagined to be existing in the forest, never bathing, eating roots, berries, and any small animals he is able to kill. As a rudimentary tool user, utility and functionality are his keys to survival. The Interior Decorator lives be surrounded by beauty. She needs to have everything perfectly placed, spotlessly clean, and looking beautiful. Utility and functionality are secondary (and maybe even less important than that). So the two types have radically different views of how the toilet should be used, and what the local "toilet environment" should look like. This is typically what sparks arguments between the Paleolithic Man and the Interior Decorator. He uses the toilet as a tool/stool/step ladder, and she cannot stand the fact that he is messing up her "decor." Interior Decorator and Macho Man The Interior Decorator goes to a lot of effort to ensure the toilet environment is beautiful. Part of the effort involves actually decorating the toilet, and frequently the toiled lid. Sometimes the toilet lid is a special design, being carved wood, embroidered vinyl, or some other special material. If the toilet lid itself is not "special," then the Interior Decorator takes pains to make sure it is appropriately covered. The covering can be like a shag rug material, or a lace material, or something equally "decorative." What sparks the anger of the Interior Decorator is when the Macho Man leaves the toilet seat up and destroys all her hard work. Who wants to see the toilet with the seat up? Queen of the Realm and Macho Man Here is the cauldron that creates the ultimate toilet seat argument. Here in its rawest form is the source of conflict between many, many men and women. This is the quintessential argument that has existed from the time toilets evolved seats, and will probably exist for all time. The Queen of the Realm wants the toilet seat down, and the Macho Man wants the toilet seat up. This seemingly small difference is in fact a huge chasm, and is great enough to spark heated arguments that are never resolved. As long as neither side budges, there will always be a conflict. Continued next month with steps towards conflict
resolution. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
© 1998-2006 All Rights Reserved - But feel free to forward
this or email it to all of your friends. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Copyright ISCDFW.COM, 1998-2006 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||